Wednesday, 29 June 2016

Digitising Hospitals


Digitising Hospitals


































A veteran in the IT service industry, J. P. Dwivedi is currently the Chief Information Officer of the Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute in New Delhi and is well-equipped to answer your queries.
U_Ask
P. Dwivedi is the Chief Information Officer of the Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute in New Delhi. He is a senior leader in IT service industry with 21 years of experience working in India, UK, USA and Singapore. He has vast experience in various sectors including healthcare, finance and investment banking, HR, hospitality, car rental, energy, retail, telecom manufacturing and railways.
1.What are the key ways that healthcare organizations can use mobile technology to make an impact in patient care in India?
Mobile technology has provided tremendous help to both the doctors and patients. Enabled by several smart applications, the doctors receive current appointment list on mobile, they can give appointments and check their schedules. Doctors could be notified on several events e.g. the patient getting admitted, patient getting discharged, any abnormal lab or radiology results etc. Moving a bit further, doctor can access patient records from anywhere and order a new medicine or stop some of the medicines currently being given to the patients.
The patient experience has tremendously improved in many progressive hospitals with the use of mobile technology. Patients receive appointment confirmation, appointment cancellation, lab and radiology results, reminders for taking medicines or any screening due. The relatives may be informed when patient gets a bed after admission. A notification can go to relatives when patient is due for discharge. Finally patient could be empowered by having entire medical record either on the cloud or in a portable media to provide continuity of care wherever the patient goes.
These are few of the examples where mobile technology is currently being used. The possibilities are endless.
2. How can healthcare organizations implement mobile technology in a way that caters to all sections of society?
Implementing mobile technology does not cost a fortune. Smartphones are seen everywhere with every strata of people. The industry needs a lot of standardization and collaboration amongst various healthcare providers in the interest of the patients.
3. What percentage of its budget should a healthcare organization allocate to Information Technology?
There cannot be a standard formula as every organization is different. However, rule of thumb is around 2-3% of total revenue in Operational Expenditure and around 1-2% in new projects and capital expenditure (except during initial set-up).
Implementing mobile technology does not cost a fortune
4. How can older institutions keep up with the advancements in technology? What are the steps involved?
It is not wise to throw away what you have and embrace the latest. Technology is just a means to realize the vision and strategy. The itch to have the latest does not always make a sound business sense. On the other hand sticking to what you have can make your organization sluggish and backward. One has to tread the path of technological advancement carefully. Technology strategy has to be fully in synch with business strategy. The areas where better diagnosis, better treatment, better patient experience, patient cost saving are concerned, one must be open to embrace new technology. Similarly, if collaborating with other hospitals requires technology upgrade, it makes sense to go for it. However, in the areas of minor operational efficiency gains, look & feel, employee experience etc., one should go relatively slow.
Technology is a big enabler for any transformation
5. How can organizations with IT department in place keep pace with the changes in technology?
Every organization needs an in-house IT department. The size of IT department would depend upon various factors e.g. In-house vs. Outsourcing policy, management’s vision, ability to take pains in managing risks, business continuity etc. Even if you outsource everything, at least a group of core team would be needed to make sure the vendors do not take the organization for a ransom. IT is less about gadgets and more about people. The employees must be regularly trained and exposed to the latest technology available in the Industry. The policies should be employee friendly to the extent that they are motivated and engaged. Most important factor is the role of the CIO in keeping the in-house IT team and key vendors engaged and forward looking. A continuous evaluation of what better could be done with existing technology and what should be changed is needed. Even if a change is required, it should neither be abrupt, nor dead slow. One must master the art of change management. That is the real job of IT.
6. Does IT implementation give an organization an edge over its competitors? If yes, how so?
Absolutely. Technology is a big enabler for any transformation. It has been the case for ages. However, the advantage is temporary only until others catch-up. Thereafter, it becomes a survival point. No one can even survive without equivalent or better technology as being used by competition.
7. What is the best way to deal with staff who is resistant to incorporate technology?
Most of the resistance comes from a need to learn new things. There are several ways to break the patterns. Technology should be introduced in gradual and systematic manner. It is like any other change management project where you need to identify champions, implement changes in peripheries as pilot projects, encourage, empower, incentivize, instruct, demand (whatever works?). There is no single formula.
Technology should be introduced in gradual and systematic manner
8. What should be done to ensure safety of patient records and other confidential information?
This is one of the most important aspects while considering electronic health record implementation or even digitizing paper records. Stringent access control procedures must be put in place. These procedures must be periodically audited. Overall end point protection is very important. Every single access of the Electronic or digitized records must be requested, approved and documented for future reference for maintaining confidentiality and integrity of patient records.
9. Are there any best practices we can follow (any hospitals, helathcare organistaions that have successfully integrated IT).
Technology is a big enabler both in biomedical engineering and in information technology areas. Today, there is no alternative to embracing technology. Days are gone when everything was written on paper and give to the patient (to keep or lose). Enduring continuity of care is extremely important to ensure quality of care delivery outcomes.
Today, there is no alternative to embracing technology
Several hospitals are aiming to become paperless. One example of real (nearly) paperless hospital is  ‘Columbia Asia’. Tata Memorial Hospital Calcutta is another example of near paper less hospital. Many leading hospitals of the country have embraced technology to a great extent.
We at Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre have taken several steps in integrating  technology with the processes. In some areas, we have accomplished excellent results. Whereas, in some other areas, we still have a significant distance to cover. We have automated patient workflow starting from appointment till all the orders, lab and radiology system integration, reporting and even notification to patients along with reports being made visible to the patients on their computers / mobiles. Nursing records are being maintained online and clinical records are being transcribed alongside the digitization of the paper records.
 

Rubrics - Grading and Performance


Rubrics - Grading and Performance

What are Rubrics?

A rubric is a scoring tool that explicitly represents the performance expectations for an assignment or piece of work. A rubric divides the assigned work into component parts and provides clear descriptions of the characteristics of the work associated with each component, at varying levels of mastery. Rubrics can be used for a wide array of assignments: papers, projects, oral presentations, artistic performances, group projects, etc. Rubrics can be used as scoring or grading guides, to provide formative feedback to support and guide ongoing learning efforts, or both.

Advantages of Using Rubrics

Using a rubric provides several advantages to both instructors and students. Grading according to an explicit and descriptive set of criteria that is designed to reflect the weighted importance of the objectives of the assignment helps ensure that the instructor’s grading standards don’t change over time. Grading consistency is difficult to maintain over time because of fatigue, shifting standards based on prior experience, or intrusion of other criteria. Furthermore, rubrics can reduce the time spent grading by reducing uncertainty and by allowing instructors to refer to the rubric description associated with a score rather than having to write long comments. Finally, grading rubrics are invaluable in large courses that have multiple graders (other instructors, teaching assistants, etc.) because they can help ensure consistency across graders and reduce the systematic bias that can be introduced between graders.

Used more formatively, rubrics can help instructors get a clearer picture of the strengths and weaknesses of their class. By recording the component scores and tallying up the number of students scoring below an acceptable level on each component, instructors can identify those skills or concepts that need more instructional time and student effort.

Grading rubrics are also valuable to students. A rubric can help instructors communicate to students the specific requirements and acceptable performance standards of an assignment. When rubrics are given to students with the assignment description, they can help students monitor and assess their progress as they work toward clearly indicated goals. When assignments are scored and returned with the rubric, students can more easily recognize the strengths and weaknesses of their work and direct their efforts accordingly.


 

A MAHALINGAM
BSc, BSOA (BITS), PG DOM, Dip.in T&D (ISTD), EDHM (LIBA), M B A (HM)
DIRECTOR - TWINTECH ACADEMY BUSINESS MANAGEMENT(Regd) &
MANAGING TRUSTEE - TWINTECH INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION TRUST (Regd)
No 1 / A, PILLAIYAR KOIL ST, MENEMBEDU, AMBATTUR,CHENNAI - 600053
PROFILE : www.mahali.in / Mobile : 97104 85295
E Mail : 2525india@gmail.com / mahali@mahali.in
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional Chapter Activities & Memberships:
Association of Healthcare Providers (India) - AHPI
Member - Society of Pharmaceutical Education & Research (SPER)
National Council Member - Indian Society for Training & Development
Director - C STAR (COMMON WEALTH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY FOR RESEARCH)


Friday, 24 June 2016

Doctors and hospitals can't be dragged to court if patient not cured 100 per cent: NCDRC - INDIA TODAY – 24.06.2016


INDIA TODAY – 24.06.2016

Doctors and hospitals can't be dragged to court if patient not cured 100 per cent: NCDRC


The only question which was to be considered was if the doctor had performed his duties to the best of his abilities and with due care and caution, said the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

Hospitals and doctors cannot be dragged to courts and asked to pay compensation merely because a patient was not cured 100 per cent after treatment or a surgery, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has ruled.

WHAT THE RULING SAID

The only question which is to be considered is if the doctor has performed his duties to the best of his abilities and with due care and caution, said the forum.

"In the very nature of the medical profession, skills differ from doctor to doctor and more than one alternative course of treatment is available, all admissible.

Merely because the doctor chooses one course of action in preference to the other one available, he would not be liable, if the course of action chosen by him was acceptable to the medical profession", a bench headed by Justice JM Malik said.

THE CASE

The Commission made the observation while upholding a judgment of the Haryana State Consumer Commission which refused to order compensation to one Rajesh Taneja who was suffering from Ankylosing Spondylitis (which seriously affects the pelvis).

He had contended that he was not cured completely after a surgery at Kaiser Hospital in Panchkula as he still could not walk.

He had sued the hospital and three doctors there seeking a compensation of Rs 90 lakh.

Alleging "unfair trade practice," Taneja contended that the doctors had no knowledge or experience in joint surgeries.

He also alleged that the hospital had no necessary instruments and was not well equipped to perform such operations.

NO NEGLIGENCE

However, after perusing all records, the National Commission came to the rescue of the private hospital saying, "We are of the considered view that the complainant was suffering from Ankylosing Spondylitis which is not completely curable and only corrective surgeries are helpful for mobility of the patient.

Therefore, the alternative mode of surgery adopted by the doctors (Girdle stone arthroplasty) was not negligence, whereas, it is only a recognised alternative mode of surgery, when total hip replacement is not possible."